| 
Tracking Treasure Down
Gabriel & Dresden—Dance Music’s Original
Digital Boys—Continue to Go for the Gold
Published in the July 2006 issue
of DJ Times Magazine
Volume 19 - Number 7
By Emily Tan
New York City—Well before they met
at Winter Music Conference and became one of dance-music’s
top DJ/production teams, Josh Gabriel and Dave Dresden were already
pursuing digital directions.
Gabriel’s musical education was the more formal of the two.
Enlightened as a youth by Walter Carlos’ seminal Moog-fest
Switched-On Bach, Gabriel became fascinated with electronic music
and eventually studied it at Holland’s Institute of Sonology.
He later earned a degree in composition from California Institute
of the Arts and founded Mixman Technologies, so when plug-in culture
became the norm, he was ready.
Dresden, meanwhile, was an all-CD jock in Connecticut at a time
when the vast majority of club DJs scoffed at such things. Learning
to spin on early Technics single decks, then Denons and ultimately
Pioneers, Dresden played all over his home state and select parties
in NYC. He also did some A&R work for Promo Only—he chose
tunes for the sub service’s monthly CD compilations—and,
perhaps less crucially, contributed nearly a decade’s worth
of reviews and features for DJ Times.
Now the Cali-based duo stands at the summit. Their remixes are sought
after by major global jocks like Tiësto and Paul Oakenfold.
Their instant-classic productions like “As the Rush Comes”
and latest single, “Tracking Treasure Down,” display
strong songwriting chops and the ability to successfully collaborate
with artists like Jes and Molly Bancroft. And their all-digital
DJ sets—a mixture of Ableton Live and Pioneer CDJ-1000s—have
wowed international clubland.
G&D’s rise-to-fortune story has been told in DJ Times
before—it was exactly two years ago that the pair graced the
cover of our second-annual Digital DJ issue. Nonetheless, we figured:
Who better than Gabriel & Dresden to discuss the state of digital
DJing as it relates to their work and the industry as a whole? So,
as their eponymous artist album (on their Organized Nature imprint)
hit the racks, we caught up with Josh, Dave and their manager Guy
Ornadel at Caribbean Spice, DJ Times’ favorite Jamaican
restaurant in Manhattan. Here’s how it went.
DJ Times: Why record your debut album as a continuous
mix?
Josh Gabriel: Gabriel & Dresden is about the
journey we take people on when we DJ. We wanted our album to represent
that feeling. When we were deciding how to do it, there was the
mix-CD approach with drums at the beginning and end and beatmixed
together, but we didn’t want it to be confused with a mix-CD.
We decided to make it more Pink Floyd-ish, with an ambient beginning
and end. It creates a unique feeling that’s both artist album
and DJ-ish.
DJ Times: Josh, you and Dave sang on this album.
Gabriel: Yeah, and the main vocalists were Molly
Bancroft and Jan Burton, with back-up vocals from my wife, Kristy.
DJ Times: What was your creative process like in
the studio, and how does Dave’s DJing in the studio inform
the end result of your recordings?
Gabriel: First of all, each of the vocalists came
individually to the studio for three or four days at a time. We
worked on ideas from scratch, both co-writing lyrics and music with
them. Molly and Jan are writers on the songs. We needed to do that
because we wanted the songs to feel honest.
Dave Dresden: We wanted to represent ourselves
with words that were ours. A lot of our songs are copy-and-paste
things.
Gabriel: For “Tracking Treasure Down,”
I’d scribbled a song that was never recorded. One of the lyrics
was, “At the same time/tracking treasure down,” and
Dave was like, “That’s the chorus!”
Dresden: I started singing, “Tracking treasure down…”
to music that Molly had in her Korg Electribe…
Gabriel: Then we started writing more words and
melodies around that, together.
Dresden: Meanwhile, I happened to DJ a couple of
beats that I liked at that time. I’d loop a beat, and this
beat would just totally make the music. It gave it a shape and that
felt really good. That gave me a flavor. Essentially, we put together
a rough version and then created the version that’s on the
album. It’s more like a remix in the process, in that we used
all the parts that we wrote the version of the song from. When you’re
working with a singer who doesn’t live in your town, you have
a limited amount of time to work with them, so you create a lot
of parts so you have something to work with. That has to do with
our extensive knowledge of remixing. But, it’s not the only
way we write songs. For the vocal tracks, we finished those after
the singers were gone.
DJ Times: Explain Dave’s role in the creation
of this album vs. Josh’s role.
Gabriel: I’d say that I am definitely the
engineer and the producer and technical end, creating sounds, making
the mix, doing work with Logic Pro and all that stuff. I play a
lot of instruments—bass guitar, guitars, keyboards—I’m
really good with texture, melodies and harmonies. The area that
I’m not good at is what Dave’s strength is: making sure
it’s really ready for the dancefloor, and Dave has a keen
sense of what people will react to in a popular sense. Dave’s
the “hook man.” If I play two melodies, he’ll
know which one is better. He knows what’s “hit-song-worthy.”
That’s invaluable. Without Dave, we’d never get it right.
I can drive things and know that where we’re driving is the
right place.
Dresden: I understand the emotional feeling of
music from having been a DJ for so many years and knowing not only
how crowds react, but why they remember music, why it touches them.
It’s almost a sixth sense with me.
Gabriel: I have a sixth sense, too, but I don’t
trust myself [laughs]. Dave always knows which songs are gonna be
big before they’re big.
Dresden: When I first started, I used to hype Josh
on everything we worked on. It wasn’t a session until I got
excited and hyper about it. That’s part of the process, too.
You have to love it ’til the end of the process. I’ve
heard “Tracking Treasure Down” more times than I’ve
ever heard any song. We’ve gone through the writing process
of that track, through the production, mixing, A&R, the DJing
process, and I still love that song!
Gabriel: Dave doesn’t analyze things. He’s
not confused by thinking in that way. He feels things. When he hears
things, he experiences it and that’s how he feels. I’m
always the guy who likes the obscure track on the album.
Dresden: Josh has taught me a few things about
appreciation. He’s helped me hone in on what makes me good.
I used to be able to accept if a mixdown was horrible, or a song
had a bad line in it. Now, I can’t. He explains what bad production
is.
Gabriel: I think because Dave wasn’t part
of the music-making process, he didn’t understand what was
being communicated in good production. Most people can’t accept
watching a poorly produced movie because they have a lot of experience
with visuals. Most people can’t recognize what makes music
good or bad because they don’t know the music-making process.
Good production communicates something.

DJ Times: There’s a lot of proper song construction
on this album. Are you moving away from dancefloor-destroying trance
tracks?
Gabriel: Not at all. We don’t really see
any difference between this and anything else we’ve done.
Dresden: If you listened to the songs from the
extended version, you’d see they’re more dance.
Gabriel: We feel, as with anything, your tastes develop and change
over time. We were really inspired by indie rock, electro and minimal
techno things that were happening.
Dresden: We were really moved when we heard The
Postal Service album. It was like, somebody did it right. It felt
as important as Depeche Mode.
DJ Times: What inspired this album?
Dresden: Touring, seeing the world from the perspective of somebody
who’s always dreamt of seeing the world as a DJ or musician.
Life, and the singers definitely were an integral part of this album.
Gabriel: We play all those songs in clubs. Our
hope is that this album can transcend dance music. We feel like
we’re a band that uses all the things we’ve been influenced
by over the years. We’re just as inspired by Depeche Mode,
Duran Duran, minimal techno, acid house…all those things go
into what makes us, us.
Dresden: For us, it’s always been about the
song. Even our remixes, we were very mindful and respectful of the
song. We made sure the song felt like a song because as a DJ coming-up,
I always got frustrated when the radio version was better than the
dance mix. Dubs are cool and they’re great, but if it’s
a vocal track, it should feel like a song. It’s a rule that
I now live by as a producer. Maybe I’ll grow out of it.
DJ Times: Why did you feel the need to re-record
Kansas’ “Dust In The Wind”?
Gabriel: As part of our artist album, we wanted
to do a cover because we like listening to covers of bands. A great
way to understand people is to understand their interpretation of
someone else’s music. We liked the original song. We could’ve
written the lyrics ourselves. That song is timeless. The fact that
it was originally sung by a male with an acoustic guitar, and we
recorded it with a female as a dance track. We wanted it to sound
nothing like the original. It just seemed like a great contrast.
DJ Times: Josh, did you record this album completely
in your home studio?
Gabriel: All in my home studio.
DJ Times: What gear and software did you use to
record this album?
Gabriel: Mainly Logic Pro, some Ableton Live, everything
run through a Mac G5.
DJ Times: Did you use any analog gear on this album?
Gabriel: We have a MiniMoog Voyager, an electric
bass, electric and acoustic guitars, a tuned log drum. [Editor’s
Note: Please see equipment list.]
DJ Times: What’s the single most important
component of your studio?
Gabriel: The Moog, for this album.
Dresden: We bought it in the middle of the process
and it ended up being an integral part of the songs.
Gabriel: We knew if we bought something that was
hardware, it would change our sound. It wasn’t something we
were looking for. We were drawn like flies to the blue lights [laughs].
We were messing around like kids in a candy store. We liked every
sound we were hearing, and we were having fun. If we’re not
having fun in the studio, we’re not making good music. That
was a great investment.
Dresden: We wanted to infuse the room and change
the set up of the room.
DJ Times: Are there sounds created with analog
gear–such as the Moog Voyager and Roland TR-909—that
you feel cannot be accurately re-created using plug-ins?
Dresden: We didn’t have a 909, but Scarlett Etienne had one
and we used hers for “Eleven,” which she co-wrote with
us.
Gabriel: Different tools lead you to different
places. The sounds you’re gonna make in 15 minutes with the
Moog are not the same sounds you’re gonna make with plug-ins.
In the keyboard sounds, it’s actually me playing the MiniMoog
synthesizer in real-time and the audio’s being recorded. Because
it’s not MIDI data, it’s not quantized, so you hear
the mistakes, and those mistakes are organic. The tools always change
the output. If you use analog gear, you’re gonna have something
different from plug-ins. Not one is better than the other; they’re
just different.
Dresden: Josh has always made a point to say that
what you lose from the analog experience, you gain from other things,
like control. People were very uppity about DJs who spun CDs. I’ve
been spinning CDs since I started DJing in 1989. People used to
tell me that I wasn’t a DJ, but I never liked vinyl because
I never played vinyl. New York City had accepted CDs by the late-’90s,
but when I moved to L.A. in 2000 to work for Groove Radio, L.A.
didn’t have CDs in most of the clubs. I went from being a
well-respected DJ in New York to being a nobody spinning CDs in
L.A. I couldn’t get a gig. I remember when Josh first said
he was gonna use Ableton Live to DJ with, I balked and said, “That’s
not DJing!” Josh explained to me that it’s not about
what you’re using, it’s about what you’re doing.
It’s about the output. I like the fact that the CDJ-1000 has
a looping feature; I have an attachment to that CD player.
DJ Times: What comprises your live DJ set-up, at
the moment?
Gabriel: We have a Mac G4 laptop running Ableton
Live, an M-Audio FireWire 410 audio interface connected into the
club mixer with cables. Now that we’ve been doing this for
a while, we have ideas of how we want to change our set-up. One
of the things we wanted to do was add some type of controller to
be able to control the effects and remote parameters. The problem
in the DJ booth is space and also finding the right controller.
I recently found…there’s a place in Holland called STEIM,
they make software called junXion and it allows you to connect a
USB video game controller to your computer and translate that into
MIDI data for Ableton Live. So, you can hook up to six USB controllers.
Imagine being able to do filter-sweeps with six joysticks! We’re
trying to make effects more intuitive.
Dresden: We’re not people who are misty-eyed
for vinyl. I don’t think we look like we’re reading
our emails by DJing with a laptop. I think the acceptance of any
other medium besides vinyl has almost gone 180-degrees.
Gabriel: People have accepted the fact that vinyl
is not the format of choice anymore. Vinyl was the standard for
so long people never questioned it. Now that it’s not standard,
people’s ideas are changing.
Dresden: Downloading has lessened the value of
music. Over time, DJs realized the CDJ-1000 as a superior piece
of equipment, very well thought-out for a DJ’s performance.
DJs just got addicted to that and the convenience of MP3s and getting
music so easily.
Gabriel: We’ll have changed over to the new joysticks by July.
It’ll allow us to add a new layer of controllability. With
that, comes new ways of DJing.
Dresden: It’ll further blur the lines between
bands and DJs. Even if it’s not music that you made, you are
really affecting it.
DJ Times: How do you think a controller like these
joysticks will affect the future of DJs?
Gabriel: Ten years ago, you’d go to the record
store and that’s how you got music. Now, I’m the guy
spending extra time in the studio. Dave’s the guy at home
for hours and hours online IM-ing with producers and getting new
music for our sets directly from producers. Music gets created and
sent much quicker now. Sites like Beatport, where you can buy stuff
from indie labels, really help. Dave loves a cappellas. We were
in Washington, D.C., the other day and he was trading a cappellas
with someone. He’d bought a John Tejada song from Beatport.
It was a great track, but it didn’t fit into our sets. Ableton
Live has enabled guys like Dave, who don’t have 20 years of
production experience, to take parts from a James Holden track.
That’s part of being a digital DJ—he can go to Beatport,
slap together a bootleg in a day and we’re DJing it that weekend.
Dresden: We were on a plane to Australia, and we’d
wanted to play something distinctly Australian. I took an Infusion
track and mixed it with our track, “Arcadia,” and now
that’s the only version that we play out! It’s like
how hip hop gave people who weren’t musicians a voice. I’m
not a musician; I’m a DJ who has a good ear, but I didn’t
go to music school. I don’t know all the things that Josh
knows, the technical jargon. But programs like Ableton Live give
you the ability to realize a dream that you might not have realized,
and that’s going to change music. The fact that Mac computers
come with GarageBand is huge. It’s like, “Logic Lite.”
It’s laid-out very simply so that a person with very little
knowledge of music can do what’s in his mind.
DJ Times: What kind of new DJ product would you
like to see created?
Gabriel: One is a three-dimensional projection
screen above the audience that would allow them to visualize the
music as we’re playing it. We visualize music in a certain
way, and that doesn’t translate usually in a club. Imagine
the difference between radio and MTV when it first came out. It
didn’t make sense to have music alone, anymore. I personally
think DJing would be more fun to not be in the DJ booth. I’d
love to have the joysticks on the dancefloor.
Dresden: I only doubted for a second when he chose
Ableton Live; I feel like I’m a better DJ because of Live.
Just the way the program works, everything’s put on a grid,
everything’s quantized. We usually don’t have headphones
on, so we can talk about the segue and do it as it’s happening.
It makes music-making so much more fun.
Gabriel: Dave had an idea to play a song from The
Streets’ Original Pirate Material, so he started playing that
over the song I was playing. I reacted and started taking the high
frequencies away so you could hear the voice, ’til it went
down to a rumble. Then I kept taking the frequencies up again.
Dresden: We were playing Paul Oakenfold’s
“Southern Sun” and we put an a cappella right into the
interlude. I didn’t know exactly where it was gonna go. When
Josh grabbed the filter, it worked. You could feel the energy of
the room building as Josh built the energy back up, and then I looped
that.
Gabriel: That’s why we’re like a band.
We’ve developed this DJing style over time, like a drummer
and guitarist know each other. But, sometimes we yell at each other,
and train wrecks on the computer are the absolute worst.
DJ Times: How so?
Dresden: Dumb shit like bad EQing and not knowing
a song, or if the vocal comes back too soon, bad things can happen.
DJ Times: What are the pros and cons of DJing with
Ableton Live?
Gabriel: Pros: You’ve got more focus on the
music and the intricacies of what you’re doing and where you’re
taking people. There’s new ways to control sound, so you have
lots of effects and plug-ins. You can have beats from one song with
vocals from another, with music from yet another song. It’s
unmatched control of creativity. Cons: Bringing a laptop into a
club can be cumbersome. You get in the way of the DJ before you.
Set-up is a pain because you’re a kink in the neck of the
club’s system.
Dresden: What I love about Ableton Live is that
it wasn’t made for DJs. What’s great is that what’s
been accepted by dance music are things that were never intended
to be used the way we’re using them. It’s like punk
rock. What I don’t like with Ableton Live is that you can’t
see both waveforms at the same time. You don’t have a bird’s-eye
view of your music. I do like the fact that dance music always thrives
on things that weren’t intended for it—like the tree
that grows out of cement.
DJ Times: How do you see the future of digital
DJing?
Gabriel: The joystick is a special order from some
gaming controller website. We’re not gonna modify it; it’ll
just be straight out of the box. If that doesn’t work, we’ll
find another thing.
Dresden: We’re getting more into DJing with two laptops, but
we carry CDs as a back-up. We’re thinking of new ways to do
what we’re doing, because DJing needs to get fresh again.
It’s becoming a little bit routine. When we DJ, we sing all
the songs. We really passionately like these songs.
| |
G&D Studio Gear
Ableton Live 5.2
Apple Cinema HD monitor
Apple Logic Pro 7.1.1
Apple Mac G5
Apple Powerbook G4
Behringer MX1604 mixer
Fender Jazz bass
Fender Stratocaster guitar
Grace 101 mic preamp
IK Multimedia Sonik Synth
Mackie HR824 active monitor
Mackie HRS120 sub
M-Audio FireWire 410 interface
Moog Music Minimoog Voyager synth
MOTU 828mkII 24/96 FireWire audio interface
Native Instruments Reaktor 5.1 plug-in
Ohm Force Fromage
Pioneer CDJ-1000s
Pioneer DJM-909 mixer
Prosoniq NorthPole Resonant Filter
Roland SH-101 synth
Roland TR-909 drum machine
Schlagwerk tuned log drum
Sequential Circuits Prophet 600 MIDI synth
Spectrasonics Atmosphere
Spectrasonics Stylus RMX
Spectrasonics Trilogy
Studio Projects T3 vacuum tube mic
Summit Audio TLA-50 tube compressor
Takamine GS330S acoustic guitar
Technics SL-1200 turntables
Waves L1 and L2 Ultramaximizer signal
processors
|
|
|